Will AI replace Medical Dosimetrists?
Healthcare Practitioners and Technical · O*NET 29-2036.00
Task exposure index for this occupation
Averaged across the week, this work sits in the middle of the exposure scale: a real part of it is already automatable and a real part is not. O*NET breaks Medical Dosimetrists into 31 distinct work activities. Weighted by how much of the week each one takes, 42% of the job sits at or above the threshold where current systems can do the task end to end. The single largest contributor is "Analyze health-related data", which scores 86 and takes roughly 8% of the week. That is the average for the job title. It is not a measurement of any particular person’s week, and the difference between the two is usually larger than the difference between job titles.
Model v1.2 · activity indices last updated 18 August 2026
What this occupation does
Generate radiation treatment plans, develop radiation dose calculations, communicate and supervise the treatment plan implementation, and consult with members of radiation oncology team.
The most exposed parts of the job
Scored 0–100 on how completely a current system could perform the activity.
- Record vital statistics or other health information.95
About 3% of a typical week
- Maintain medical records.95
About 3% of a typical week
- Analyze health-related data.86
About 8% of a typical week
- Calculate numerical data for medical activities.86
About 8% of a typical week
- Collect medical information from patients, family members, or other medical professionals.72
About 2% of a typical week
The least exposed parts
The same scale. These are the activities current systems handle worst.
- Operate diagnostic imaging equipment.12
About 7% of a typical week
- Fabricate medical devices.16
About 7% of a typical week
- Make patient-assistive devices or device models.16
About 2% of a typical week
- Adjust settings or positions of medical equipment.16
About 4% of a typical week
- Calibrate equipment to specifications.16
About 1% of a typical week
How far off the rest is
Of those 31 activities, 7 can be performed by systems available today and 13 are outside what current approaches do at all. The remaining 11 sit in between — demonstrated in research or in narrow products, but not something you can hand over whole. We do not put dates on that middle group, because nobody can.
Compared with similar occupations
The nearest scoring roles in Healthcare Practitioners and Technical.
- Medical Dosimetrists (this page)49
- Neurologists49
- Pediatric Surgeons48
- Physical Therapists50
Why your own number is different
Two people with the title "Medical Dosimetrists" can spend their weeks on almost entirely different parts of this list, and the parts they choose move the number far more than the title does. Who signs off when the work is wrong, whether the job needs you physically present, and how fast you have picked up the tools all change it again — and none of that is in an occupation average.
The assessment asks you to divide your own week across these activities and answer fourteen questions about the parts of the job an occupation average cannot see. It takes six to nine minutes.
Score my own roleFree to take. The full report is a paid subscription — the price and its terms are on the pricing section, before you start.
Questions
Will AI replace Medical Dosimetrists?
We do not answer that, because nobody can. What is measurable is how much of the work is already doable by machine: for Medical Dosimetrists, about 42% of a typical week, across 31 activities. The other 58% is not, and what happens to the job depends on things this index does not contain — cost, regulation, who carries the liability, and what the people doing it decide to do next.
What part of this job is most exposed?
"Record vital statistics or other health information" — it scores 95 out of 100 on task automatability and takes roughly 3% of the week.
What part is least exposed?
"Operate diagnostic imaging equipment", at 12 out of 100. Work like that is where the hours you protect tend to be worth the most.
Where do these numbers come from?
The activity list and the time weights come from O*NET 30.3, the US Department of Labor's occupational database. The exposure score for each activity is ours, from a published model — the weights, the priors and the limitations are all on the methodology page. No language model is involved in the arithmetic.
Does this apply to my job?
Only roughly. This is the average for the title, and the number that matters is the one for the week you actually work. The assessment asks you to divide your own time across these activities and answer fourteen questions about accountability, the parts of the job that need you specifically, and how fast you have adapted. That produces a different number, and usually a more useful one.
The full model — the weights, the priors and what it cannot see — is on the methodology page.