doesaidomyjob

Will AI replace Stone Cutters and Carvers, Manufacturing?

Production · O*NET 51-9195.03

What this occupation does

Cut or carve stone according to diagrams and patterns.

The most exposed parts of the job

Scored 0–100 on how completely a current system could perform the activity.

The least exposed parts

The same scale. These are the activities current systems handle worst.

How far off the rest is

Of those 14 activities, 0 can be performed by systems available today and 11 are outside what current approaches do at all. The remaining 3 sit in between — demonstrated in research or in narrow products, but not something you can hand over whole. We do not put dates on that middle group, because nobody can.

Compared with similar occupations

The nearest scoring roles in Production.

Why your own number is different

Two people with the title "Stone Cutters and Carvers, Manufacturing" can spend their weeks on almost entirely different parts of this list, and the parts they choose move the number far more than the title does. Who signs off when the work is wrong, whether the job needs you physically present, and how fast you have picked up the tools all change it again — and none of that is in an occupation average.

Questions

Will AI replace Stone Cutters and Carvers, Manufacturing?

We do not answer that, because nobody can. What is measurable is how much of the work is already doable by machine: for Stone Cutters and Carvers, Manufacturing, about 16% of a typical week, across 14 activities. The other 84% is not, and what happens to the job depends on things this index does not contain — cost, regulation, who carries the liability, and what the people doing it decide to do next.

What part of this job is most exposed?

"Review blueprints or other instructions to determine operational methods or sequences" — it scores 66 out of 100 on task automatability and takes roughly 7% of the week.

What part is least exposed?

"Cut industrial materials in preparation for fabrication or processing", at 5 out of 100. Work like that is where the hours you protect tend to be worth the most.

Where do these numbers come from?

The activity list and the time weights come from O*NET 30.3, the US Department of Labor's occupational database. The exposure score for each activity is ours, from a published model — the weights, the priors and the limitations are all on the methodology page. No language model is involved in the arithmetic.

Does this apply to my job?

Only roughly. This is the average for the title, and the number that matters is the one for the week you actually work. The assessment asks you to divide your own time across these activities and answer fourteen questions about accountability, the parts of the job that need you specifically, and how fast you have adapted. That produces a different number, and usually a more useful one.

The full model — the weights, the priors and what it cannot see — is on the methodology page.

Will AI replace Stone Cutters and Carvers, Manufacturing?